Indian Rights Association records

Work on processing the Indian Rights Association records (Collection 1523) has begun and will continue for the next three months. This is another one of the Civic Engagement collections funded by NHPRC. Since portions of the collection had been previously processed here at HSP our work will consist of arranging the part of the collection that haven’t been touched (multiple boxes of unsorted materials), integrating it to the processed portion, and creating an updated guide to the collection. To help with all this work we have the help of a wonderful intern, Jenna Marrone that comes to HSP with previous archival experience obtained with the PACSCL/CLIR project.

The Indian Rights Association records (IRA) is a very rich collection featuring materials of interest for those researching the history of Native Americans, particularly the work and lobbying done on their behalf in the nation’s capital. The IRA was founded in 1882 by Hebert Welsh and Henry S. Pancoast  with a main office in Philadelphia and a field office in Washington. The organization had two chief purposes: to protect the interests and welfare of the American Indian, and, in the association’s own words, “to bring about the complete civilization of the Indians and their admission to citizenship”. Paternalistic attitudes aside, the IRA was for the first forty years of the twentieth century the major non-governmental organization offering support and protection to Native Americans. Besides its work as a lobbying group on behalf of Native Americans, the association monitored the policies and actions of the Secretary of the Interior, the Bureau of Indian Affairs, and the Board of Indian Commissioners. They also helped create or promote legislation favorable to the Indian cause, and in some cases actively supported legal cases in both state and federal court. To spread knowledge about Native American culture and the association’s work, the IRA published many pamphlets and a serial titled Indian Truth.

Documents in the collection span form 1830 to 1986 and include correspondence, organizational records, pamphlets, annual reports, draft legislation, photographs, audio-visual materials, maps, and clippings. Also in the collection we can find materials from the Council of Indian Affairs, documents about traditional Pueblo Indian dances, and legal papers about struggles faced by the Oklahoma Indians, and papers generated by Herbert Welsh.

As a sample of the contents of the collection here’s a letter by a William Phillip Knight, asking IRA for help with a freedom of religion problem while incarcerated in Ohio in 1984.

An updated finding aid for the collection will be published in the upcoming months, though you can access the current finding aid on our website here.

Mary Elizabeth Hallock Greenewalt and the Magical, Mystical, Musical Finding Aids

Yesterday, April 5th, 2011, we at HSP hosted an event for the new, Musical Finding Aid. What does this mean, you ask? Do not fret, if all your questions aren’t answered in the next paragraphs please leave a comment!

Last year Matt Shoemaker, director of digital collections and systems, was awarded a grant from the Heritage Philadelphia Program (HPP). This grant helps institutions like HSP do small, creative, out of the box projects. This year’s project, envisioned by Matt, was to select a small group musicians to compose a score no shorter than 1 minute. This score would reflect the feel and subtleties of the Mary Elizabeth Hallock Greenewalt Collection. This would, of course, express aspects of the collection which aren’t available in the neutral voice of the written finding aid. Matt did an excellent job explaining this:

“Now a finding aid, in case you do not know, is a standard research tool at archives. It is a non-interpretive tool for patrons of archives so they can more easily find the materials they would like to use. It provides some background information on the collection and what it deals with, information on how it is organized and has different levels of description to assist people about what they should look at, for their personal purposes…Finding aids are very structured, matter-of-fact, and are very careful to not impart any of the archivist’s preconceptions…When my team first thought of this project we wanted to explore the other methods for people to utilize information for fulfilling their research needs as well as try to give a taste of this feeling to researchers considering the collection.”

His words aptly sum up the trajectory of this project called the Musical Finding Aid. It was brought into fruition by 5 musicians: Willhem Echivarria, Maurice Wright, Ted Houghtaling, Max Lawrence and Andrea Clearfield.  To hear their musical creations click on the links below.

This link refers back to an earlier blog and gives great background information about the musicians:

This link is where the musical finding aid is permanently hosted on HSP’s website:

The event last night was graciously made possible by Pennsylvania Humanities Council, HSP staff volunteers, the finding aid musicians, HPP and of course Matt Shoemaker. For those that did make the event and for those that could not be there please feel free to browse the photos below.

Art by Max Lawrence

Exhibition created by Max Lawrence.

Display of Art by Max Lawrence

Mary Elizabeth Hallock Greenewalt

Materials from the Greenewalt and Adopt-a-Collection on View

Greenewalt Collection Material

Participants and Attendees


Thoughts on archival collecting

What does it take to develop an active archival collecting program? How can we focus our acquisitions on the materials we really want to collect, rather than simply the ones people offer us?

Overseeing archival acquisitions is one of my main tasks at HSP. We collect a wide variety of materials, some of them mundane, some of them unique and wonderful. Over the past half year, as examples, we’ve taken in the letters of a U.S. Army corporal who worked at General MacArthur’s occupation headquarters in Tokyo, 1946-47; a set of 22 daguerreotypes and ambrotypes depicting members of a Philadelphia-area family in the 1860s; letter and account books of a 19th-century Lehigh Valley tannery; compositions of an early 20th-century Italian American composer; and papers documenting a World War II Red Cross program to pack and ship care packages to Allied prisoners of war.

HSP’s archival collecting is guided by our board approved collection scope document and a more detailed set of collecting guidelines written by staff. Although we purchase a few small collections each year, most material comes to us as donations. And almost all of our collecting work is passive, in the sense that it starts with a phone call or email from someone who has something to offer, rather than with us going out and soliciting collection donations. There have been two reasons for this — space and time. First, the collection shelving currently in our building is almost full. By limiting our acquisitions to collections that people bring us, we’ve put off the day when we would have to say, “Sorry, no room.” Second, going out and actively looking for new collections takes time — potentially a lot of time if we want to do it systematically. Being chronically understaffed like most archival repositories, we have to think very carefully about how we allocate staff time.

This situation began to shift very recently, when HSP secured state and city funding to help pay for some critically needed building renovations — including installation of compact shelving in three storage vaults. This will give us about 7,000 more linear feet of storage space — not a huge amount, but enough to buy us about ten years of breathing room. Longer term, we’ve begun exploring other possibilities for expanding our storage capacity. Suddenly, one of the two barriers to active collecting — lack of space — seems to be crumbling.

This makes it easier to envision ways around the second barrier to actively collecting — lack of staff time. A key issue here is efficiency — if we have a clear idea of where and how to concentrate our energies, even a modest, consistent investment of time could have a significant impact. Having a clear, focused plan is also critical if we want to bring in any project funding to support this work, either from traditional funders or other private sources. (In the 1980s and 1990s, the Balch Institute for Ethnic Studies, which merged with HSP in 2002, conducted two highly successful grant-funded collecting projects — one in the Northeast Pennsylvania coal region and the other in the Delaware Valley. Since then, grant money has gotten scarcer and funders’ priorities have shifted, but there may still be some useful lessons in how the Balch went about this work.)

Developing an active collecting plan involves many different elements. For example, to help us define our area(s) of focus for active collecting, we need to identify major areas of strength and major gaps in our existing holdings, and in the holdings of other leading repositories in the Philadelphia region. More broadly, we should try to identify topics within our collecting scope that are significantly underrepresented in the documentary record. Ideally, this work would involve conversations with other departments within our organization, colleagues at other repositories, and scholars and other researchers in a variety of fields.

Along with a clear area of focus, we also need a clear work plan. Active collecting is largely about building relationships — getting to know some of the people and organizations that have potential collection materials; talking with people about what archives do and what’s involved in donating papers; and learning about their experiences, histories, and perspectives on what’s important to document. As much as possible, I think it’s important to approach collecting as a collaborative relationship, not just “taking people’s stuff,” but working with them to preserve their history in a way that addresses their needs and concerns.

These are just a few preliminary thoughts. I hope to be giving these issues a lot more thought in the weeks and months ahead.

HSP Civic Engagement Collections: A new NHPRC-funded project

This month HSP begins a new 26-month project to process and conserve fourteen collections related to civic engagement in Philadelphia and beyond. Willhem Echevarría has already started work as project archivist, and in December he will be joined by Leah Mackin as project preservation technician. Previously, both Willhem and Leah worked on our Chew papers project and Digital Center for Americana pilot project, and we’re fortunate that they’ll be continuing on with this new initiative.

In this blog post I’d like to talk about some of the reasons I’m excited about the Civic Engagement Collections project and efforts surrounding it.

Citizens' Permanent Relief Committee flyers

Flyers from Citizens' Permanent Relief Committee records, ca. 1890s

Working with great collections
The project deals with collections documenting a wonderful variety of people and organizations. These range from Albert Greenfield (real estate broker turned banker, politician, and philanthropist) to Morris Milgram (socialist activist turned integrated housing pioneer and developer of planned communities). From Anthony Biddle, Jr. (elite-born diplomat and military officer) to Max Weiner (who helped launch a grassroots consumer protection movement in the 1960s). The project includes the papers of reformers across three generations: Herbert Welsh, who from the 1870s to the 1930s tackled everything from imperialism to forestry to civil service rules; Richardson Dilworth and Natalie Saxe Randall, who helped lead Philadelphia’s political reform movement after World War II; and John Fryer, psychiatrist and gay rights activist, who in 1972 helped persuade the American Psychiatric Association to remove homosexuality from its list of mental disorders.

Organizational collections in the project include the records of the Citizens’ Permanent Relief Committee, a late 19th century philanthropic group that aided people harmed by natural disasters, famine, war, or political repression; and the Indian Rights Association, which played a key lobbying role from the 1880s to the 1930s around its paternalistic aim to “bring about the complete civilization of the Indians and their admission to citizenship.” There are also six decades of records of the League of Women Voters of Philadelphia, which promoted women’s political participation and took stands on issues ranging from child care and public education to the United Nations and the Marshall Plan.

I’m especially pleased that this project will enable us to digitize 160 hours of phonograph recordings from the Philadelphia Fellowship Commission, a pioneering civil rights coalition formed in 1941. To help promote its multi-cultural ideals, in the 1940s and 50s the commission sponsored a series of radio plays, stories, and interviews with people of diverse racial, ethnic, and religious backgrounds. The Civic Engagement project will make these recordings publicly accessible for the first time since they were broadcast.

Highlighting our 20th-century holdings
While HSP is rightly famous for our pre-20th century collections, the fact that we also have rich collections up through the late 20th century receives much less attention. For example, most of the applications to our research fellowship program (a collaboration with the Library Company of Philadelphia) focus on our pre-20th century collections. The Civic Engagement project – which primarily deals with 20th century collections — is part of our plan to change all that.

A related effort is our recently launched Greenfield Project, funded by the Albert M. Greenfield Foundation. This will endow a research fellowship in 20th-century history and create a web portal focusing on 20th-century collections and featuring related interpretive material. The Greenfield Project funding also covers archival processing work on the Greenfield Papers, which is part of the Civic Engagement project.

Max Weiner collection flyers

Flyers from Max Weiner collection on Consumer Education and Protective Association, ca. 1970s-1980s

Implementing “More Product, Less Process” (MPLP)
The Civic Engagement project is funded primarily by the National Historical Publications and Records Commission (NHPRC), the grant-giving arm of the National Archives and Records Administration. The NHPRC has gone farther than any other major archives funder in embracing MPLP principles. To get NHPRC funding for a “detailed” processing project, including any descriptive work below the collection level, a repository has to ensure that virtually all of its collections are or will soon be open for research and locatable online. This embodies one of MPLP’s key tenets, that repositories should provide a basic, minimum level of access to all their collections before giving intensive attention to a select few. HSP’s Archives Department wholeheartedly endorses this approach. For the first time ever, we will soon provide online collection-level descriptions for all our archival holdings, through a new online guide that will launch later this year.

Processing work on the Civic Engagement collections will be based on MPLP principles as well. This means that some practices will be streamlined to speed up processing and make more collections accessible more quickly. For example, collections may receive only rough arrangement below the sub-series level. Non-archival folders will be replaced only if they are damaged or do not fit in an archival box. And, yes, metal fasteners will be removed only if they are rusty or pose a hazard to users. Staff time for this project has been allocated based on an average of 2.6 hours per linear foot for processing work and 1.25 hours per linear foot for conservation work. HSP has five different processing levels that we use depending on the specific collection, and guidelines for this project are based on our Level 3 protocol, in the middle of the range.

Contributing to a regional effort
The Civic Engagement project is interconnected with a consortial processing project that HSP is participating in. The PACSCL Hidden Collections project, funded by the Council on Library and Information Resources, is processing collections at 24 institutions, including HSP. (PACSCL stands for Philadelphia Area Consortium of Special Collections Libraries.) The two projects share the same processing methodology and were developed in close coordination with each other. HSP staff helped design the PACSCL project, establish its standards, and write its manual. PACSCL project staff, in turn, has helped to train HSP staff in the use of MPLP principles and Archivists’ Toolkit. Two collections in the Civic Engagement project (League of Women Voters of Philadelphia and the World War II collection) will be processed by PACSCL project staff at HSP, working alongside HSP staff. This type of interchange enriches our work and helps us see our tasks as part of a regional effort.

PhilaPlace project strengthens HSP archival work

Recently the Historical Society of Pennsylvania acquired a small collection called the Pisano and Siciliano Families Papers. Through photographs, vital records, family histories, and other materials, this collection documents two Italian families whose members came to the United States in the early 1900s and settled in South Philadelphia and Camden, New Jersey. A highlight of the collection is the handwritten poetry of Antonio Nicola Pisano (1894-1979). Mr. Pisano, who immigrated to the U.S. at age sixteen and worked mainly as a shoemaker, had only three years of formal schooling but loved learning. He traveled from house to house, reading his poems to friends and neighbors, sometimes accompanied by musicians. Pisano was also an actor, director, and playwright, and founded a local theater troupe called the Philadelphia Filodramatic Circle Gasperinese. The collection includes several handwritten plays that were probably performed by the group.

Portrait of the Filodramatic Circle Gasperinese, in costume for the
“Passion Play of Christ,” 1931

The Pisano and Siciliano Families Papers were donated to HSP by Donna Meidt, Antonio Pisano’s granddaughter, who also contributed funds to process the collection through HSP’s Adopt-a-Collection program. One of the notable things about this donation is that Donna Meidt came to us through the PhilaPlace project.

As many readers of this blog may know, PhilaPlace is a neighborhood history and culture project, sponsored by HSP in collaboration with several other institutions and community groups. The project, which has sparked enthusiastic interest, includes a website where Philadelphians can share their experiences and memories through photos, documents, essays, and oral history recordings. (See for example, Donna Meidt’s contributions about her great-grandmother and grandfather.) The site also features interactive maps, podcast tours, K-12 lesson plans for teachers, and a blog. Beyond the website, PhilaPlace encompasses public events, teacher workshops, trolley tours, exhibits, and printed neighborhood guides.

Playbill for the “The Passion Play of Christ” presented by the
Filodramatic Circle Gasperinese, 1931

PhilaPlace performs an important community outreach role for HSP as a whole, including the Archives Department. We do not have enough staff to actively seek out collection donations, but have to rely on those that are offered to us. PhilaPlace helps to fill that gap by soliciting stories and images for its website, and more broadly by building relationships with community members and organizations. After making their histories available for use on the PhilaPlace website, sometimes people also become interested in donating their original materials to HSP’s permanent collections. (The reverse is also true: If people approach me about donating collections related to the neighborhoods PhilaPlace is focusing on, I try to also put them in touch with PhilaPlace staff.)

PhilaPlace’s emphasis on collaboration and developing community relationships reflects Project Director Joan Saverino’s background as a folklorist, as well as the hard work she and Project Coordinator Melissa Mandell have put in over the past three years. The project has done a great deal to bring HSP favorable publicity and community goodwill. It has also benefited HSP’s collections work in more specific ways, such as providing much of the impetus to develop a full-fledged collection digitization program. And recently, when I needed an oral history release form to send to a collection donor, I was able to adapt one that was created for the PhilaPlace project.

HSP is currently exploring ways that we can more closely integrate PhilaPlace with HSP’s processing, conservation, and digitization of collections, with a shared emphasis on community networking and collaboration.

What constitutes a draft of the U.S. Constitution?

Posted on behalf of Lee Arnold, HSP Library Director

What constitutes a draft of the U.S. Constitution?  This sounds like a rather simple question, but it is actually very complex.  The Historical Society of Pennsylvania (HSP) is home to millions of documents.  Of these, we have considered six of them Constitutions.  HSP has what we call the First and Second Drafts (both in James Wilson’s hand),  Edmund Randolph’s copy of the First Printed Draft, Jacob Broom’s copy of the Second Printed Draft, one of the “official” copies printed for the Constitutional Convention, and the Pennsylvania Packet printing of the Constitution (the first public printing of this document).

The first page of the first draft of the United States Constitution

The first page of the second draft of the United States Constitution

Recently a researcher, examining the second volume of the James Wilson Papers, came across a document (we’ll call it Mystery Page 63) which she believes is not only part of a Constitutional draft, but is actually a page two of a third draft of the Constitution. Here is where it gets tricky.  On the backside of the second sheet of Wilson’s First Draft, there are three upside down paragraphs with the opening wording “We the People…”  Scholars have always been aware of this “upside down” text. They have also known about page 63. The text has been published and used by scholars for a century, since Max Farrand published a transcript of this document, and even linked it with the “upside down” text in 1911. Generally, scholars have described this document as more notes from the Committee of Detail than as an actual draft.

The "upside down" paragraphs on the back of the second sheet of Wilson's first draft

The researcher who called our attention to Page 63 of the Wilson Papers believes that the “upside down” text is really the first page of another Constitutional Draft (and Page 63 being the second).  What do you think?

Front view of page 63

Front view of page 63

Back view of page 63

We have provided links to several of these documents as well as soliciting Constitutional scholars for their thoughts.   Whether folks believe this is a new found draft or simply notes from the Constitutional Convention, there is one point both sides can agree on.  HSP’s collection of Constitutional documents allow researchers to study the entire process of the making of this great document: from Wilson’s first pass at pen to paper all the way to the first public printing in the Pennsylvania Packet newspaper.    The role of the staff at the Historical Society is to keep these documents in a safe, archivally secure environment and to facilitate research.  We have been doing so since 1824.  Your support of HSP allows us to continue to do so for another 186 years.

We welcome your thoughts.

Read the 2004 article “Treasures from the Founding of the Nation” covering different versions of the U.S. Constitution held at the Historical Society of Pennsylvania.

Transcription of page 63:

from The records of the Federal convention of 1787, Issue 2  By United States. Constitutional Convention, Max Farrand, pg 151from The records of the Federal convention of 1787, Issue 2  By United States. Constitutional Convention, Max Farrand, pg 152

The complicated story of the A.A. Humphreys papers

A.A. Humphreys

I have been working on processing the Andrew Atkinson Humphreys papers for the past month and a half, and am looking to finish them up by the end of this month.  This 111 linear foot collection consists of military records related to the Civil War, Humphreys’ work as a surveyor and topographical engineer, papers related to the Bounty Fund and the Sanitary Fair, family papers, Humphreys’ writings, and many other items.  One of the most puzzling things about this collection is the amount of material that is seemingly unrelated to A.A. Humphreys’ life and work.

The first question I had about the collection was “why did Humphreys have so many of Frank Etting’s papers?”  The first 40 linear feet of the collection I rehoused consisted of payment vouchers to Civil War soldiers signed by Frank Etting, General Paymaster.  I later learned that Humphreys was Meade’s Chief of Staff during 1863-1864, which might explain some of these vouchers.  I didn’t worry too much about these materials, though, since they fit in with Humphreys’ work in the Army of the Potomac.

The next discovery was a run of 15 boxes of petitions that were collected in nearly every county in Pennsylvania during the 1830s and 1840s.  The language of the petitions covered topics like temperance, pleas for bounties on wildcats, requests for intervention in personal matters (this was usually on behalf of a widow or a woman who separated from her husband), and petitions against the death penalty.  Humphreys was not involved in politics, as far as I can tell, so these petitions are a puzzle in and of themselves.  When I started unfolding the bundles, the questions only got more complex.  I began to find letters, receipts, and other documents addressed to, or written by, Levi Hollingsworth.  HSP owns the Hollingsworth papers, so I did some detective work to try to uncover the connection between Humphreys and Hollingsworth.  I found out that Humphreys had married into the Hollingsworth family, and also that when the Hollingsworth papers were donated, they were called the Morris-Hollingsworth papers, suggesting that the Morris family papers may have also been part of the Hollingsworth family papers.  Cary and I wondered whether all of these collections were sitting near each other on the shelf when a massive rehousing project took place during the WPA, but we merely speculated about this….  This information about the Hollingsworth-Humphreys connection did little to help me understand why these petitions were included with the Humphreys papers, so I put them aside for the moment, and determined that they might be best housed with the Hollingsworth family papers.

More puzzles arose on Friday when I opened the small run of boxes labeled “Letters to Edward Armstrong, Secretary of North Pa. RR Co.”  Silly me, I assumed that these boxes would contain letters between Humphreys and Armstrong, or from Humphreys to Armstrong, but NO.  Instead, what I found were letters addressed to Armstrong from many people, but not Humphreys.  I see no connection at all, in fact, nor can I find any information about Armstrong to help me understand the connection between the two men.  I did find a few petitions mixed in with Armstrong’s letters, and the bit of information I found about him said that he was an attorney, so suddenly I started to wonder if the petitions were connected to Armstrong.  But, then, how was Armstong connected to Humphreys, and why would Humphreys have his papers?

I am writing this, primarily, as a plea for help.  If anyone out there in the reading audience has any idea how these pieces are connected, I would be more than pleased to hear your thoughts or know of any reference sources that could help.  In fact, if you can offer any useful information that can help me to make a coherent finding aid to this collection, I will personally pay for your next research visit to HSP.  I’m all ears…  And thank you.

Can You Guess the Story?

While continuing to work on the Allen collection I came across a curious set of cards. The cards were numbered in a series and each series seemed to tell some kind of moral story. Since the text is in German we had a lot of fun trying to guess what the story was just based on the illustrations. Tara O’Brien, our Director of Preservation and Conservation Services and resident German speaker/expert clued us in as to what these were and the stories they were telling, but we thought it would be fun to share these with our readers and see what you could come up with. So please, feel free to comment and share with us your guesses!

Series One:

Series Two (my personal favorite):

Series Three:

Secrets to Painless Rehousing

Today, I virtually had the processing room to myself since everyone else is out for the holiday.  This is a rare occasion, and one that I usually take advantage of by playing music and sometimes singing out loud.  (And you thought archivists were serious, proper folks who never raise their voices above a whisper except to scold you when you pick up your pen!)

After many days of sighing loudly at the number of Civil War payment vouchers I was going to have to rehouse, I happily discovered that my pace rapidly improved with a little Billy Bragg playing in the background.  I got through about ten linear feet today.

today's progress

I felt happy all day, and dancing a little bit in between boxes didn’t hurt!  I should probably not reveal these secrets, but, then again, it increased my productivity and made me feel better about all of these gritty receipts that I have to rehouse.  Perhaps it’s time for me to give in and buy an MP3 player.   Especially since this is what I have yet to finish:

so many vouchers

There are a few more shelves below these too, but instead of being dramatic about that 80 linear feet of madness that awaits me, I’ll just dance my way through it…

Happy holiday, all.

What use is a blog?

Spurred by a spate of positive comments about, first, the Chew blog and now Fondly, Pennsylvania, I have been thinking a lot about how readers use the information they gather from following our blog offerings.

I was really pleased to know that Seth Bruggeman has been using our blogs in his Public History and American Studies classes at Temple, and equally excited to have Timothy, one of Seth’s students, blogging with us here.  I know that several other professors have used the Chew blog in their history courses, and I recently heard from Matt Herbison that Susan Davis has also used the Chew blog in her archives courses at Drexel.  All of this leaves me cheering.  I have connected with other archives bloggers about what they’re doing, and it has helped me to shape my ideas about how to use this valuable resource.  This whole digital community idea seems to be unfolding beautifully.  The only part missing is direct feedback from users.

How do we know what will mean something to you, our dear readers?  How can we keep you reading along?  How can we serve up the most interesting, tantalizing behind the scenes views from our shop?


I guess, in many ways, this is always the problem with information management.  We provide many tools to our users, but it is sometimes difficult to know which ones serve them best.  So we do user studies or solicit feedback from our patrons.  Or we just guess.

Up until now, we’ve just been guessing here at the Historical Society of Pennsylvania.  We’re putting out the stories of what we’re doing, and people seem to be reading along, but we don’t really know why.  Is it because we have a nice look about us?  Do you appreciate our sometimes serious, sometimes silly approach?  Or is it really the collections that grab you?  What pleases you?

No, really, I’m asking…

I would love to hear from you–any and all of you–about how you use our blogs.  Please leave us a comment to tell us what you love, what you wish there were more of, and even what you could really do without.  Tell us what you do with the information you gather here–is it sheerly for pleasure?  Are you an archivist, conservator, or historian who likes to keep up with the field?  What use is this blog to you?  I would especially encourage those of you who were followers of the Chew blog and have now migrated to Fondly, Pennsylvania to respond.  I really look forward to hearing from some of you.

Thank you for reading, and for your thoughtful feedback.

Fondly,  Cathleen